Raymond Carré de Malberg, et à sa s

Raymond Carré de Malberg, et à sa suite le Professeur René Capitant, ont adopté un critère différent. Pour Carré de Malberg, « la fonction administrative se caractérise et doit être définie par sa subordination à la loi 39». Ainsi, « toutes les fois que l’autorité administrative agit en vertu de pouvoirs légaux, il n’existe aucune raison, quelque larges et discrétionnaires que soient ces pouvoirs, de faire intervenir la notion d’acte de gouvernement 40». Au contraire, lorsque les autorités exécutives agissent sur le fondement d’une habilitation directe de la Constitution, elles se trouvent placées dans le domaine de l’action gouvernementale et leurs actes échappent au contentieux strictement administratif41.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Raymond Carré de Malberg, and its sequel the professor René Capitant, have adopted a different test. Carré de Malberg, 'the administrative function is characterized and must be defined by its subordination to law 39. Thus, "whenever the administrative authority acting under statutory powers, there is no reason, some broad and discretionary that are these powers involve the notion of Act of Government 40'. Instead, when the executive authorities are acting on the basis of a direct clearance of the Constitution, they are placed in the field of government action and their actions are beyond litigation strictly administratif41.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Raymond Carré de Malberg, and its sequel Professor René Capitant, adopted a different criterion. To Carré de Malberg, "the administrative function is characterized and must be defined by its subordination to the law." 39 Thus, "whenever the administrative authority acting under statutory authority, there is no reason, however broad, discretionary powers as these, to involve the notion of act of government." 40 On the contrary, when the executive authorities act on the basis of a direct empowerment of the Constitution, they have been placed in the area of ​​government action and actions beyond the strictly administratif41 litigation.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Raymond Square of Malberg's house, and to his suite the Professor Renã© Capitant, have adopted a different criterion. For Square of Malberg's house, "the administrative function is characterized and must be defined by its subordination to the law 39 ". Thus, "all the time that the administrative authority acts under statutory powers, there is no reason,Some broad and discretionary that are these powers, to involve the concept of an act of government 40 ". On the contrary, when the executive authorities are acting on the basis of a direct empowerment of the Constitution, they are placed in the area of government action and their acts are beyond the litigation strictly administratif41.