Lors de son audition par le Tribuna

Lors de son audition par le Tribunal, en qualite de representante de la defenderesse, Deirdre DEMPSEY-LECLERCQ a explique qu'au moment de la conclusion du contrat la negociation avec la banque etait « serree » et qu'elle voulait eviter de prendre le moindre risque qui aurait pu faire echouer ces negociations, raison pour laquelle elle avait signe ce contrat. Au demeurant, si TEMENOS estimait que la demanderesse n'avait pas eu d'influence quelconque sur la decision de KBANK de lui attribuer le marche, on ne comprend pas dans que!le mesure Ia non-signature de l'Introducer's Agnement aurait pu influencer ses propres rapports avec la banque.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

During his hearing by the Tribunal, as a representative of the defendant, Deirdre DEMPSEY-LECLERCQ explained that at the time of the conclusion of the contract negotiation with the Bank was "tight" and that she wanted to avoid taking any risk which could fail to do these negotiations, reason for which she signed this contract. Moreover, if TEMENOS was of the view that the applicant had not influence any decision of KBANK given the market, it is not clear that! measure Ia signed by the Introducer's Agnement could have influenced its own relationship with the Bank.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

During his hearing by the Tribunal in quality representante the defendant, Deirdre DEMPSEY-Leclercq explained that at the time the contract is concluded the negotiation with the bank was "TIGHT" and she wanted to avoid taking any risk that could have such negotiations fail failed, why she had signed the contract. Furthermore, TEMENOS estimated that if the applicant had not had any influence on the KBANK of decision to award the market, we do not understand in that! Ia measure the non-signing of the Introducer's Agnement could have influenced its own relationship with the bank.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

during the hearing by the court of first instance, the representative of the defenderesse deirdre dempsey leclercq testified that at the time of conclusion of the contract, the negotiation with the bank's "tight" and that she wanted to avoid taking any risk that might circumvent these negotiations, which is why it was a sign that the contract. at the same time,if temenos was of the view that the applicant had no influence on the decision to award him the kbank works, we do not understand that. as the non signing of the introducer's agnement could affect its relationship with the bank.